[2007] UGCommC 63

[2007] UGCommC 63

The court found that the dispute is grounded in a contract between the plaintiff and defendant, and the alleged breach and obligations under the contract are matters solely between these parties. URA's involvement, limited to investigations regarding alleged misapplication of cement, does not make it a necessary...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] UGCommC 63
Parties
Plaintiff: Kampala International University; Defendant: Hima Cement Limited
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 304 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Joinder Application
Outcome
Application to join Uganda Revenue Authority as co-defendant disallowed.
Legal Topics
Joinder of Parties, Contract Breach, Third Party Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Joinder of Parties Contract Breach Third Party Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kampala International University

Plaintiff

Hima Cement Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Joinder Application

  1. 1 Whether Uganda Revenue Authority should be joined as a co-defendant to enable the court effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all questions involved in the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the presence of Uganda Revenue Authority is necessary for the determination of the contractual dispute between the plaintiff and defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the dispute is grounded in a contract between the plaintiff and defendant, and the alleged breach and obligations under the contract are matters solely between these parties. URA's involvement, limited to investigations regarding alleged misapplication of cement, does not make it a necessary party to the suit. The presence of URA as a witness would suffice for any evidentiary matters. The suit is not liable to be defeated by non-joinder of URA, who is a stranger to the contract and not privy to its terms. The defendant's application to join URA was seen as a delay tactic, and the proper course for the defendant, if it believes URA is liable, is to pursue third party...

Court Disposition

Application to join Uganda Revenue Authority as co-defendant disallowed.

Orders

  • Suit to be determined on the merits between plaintiff and defendant only.
  • Costs shall abide the outcome of the suit.