[2007] UGCommC 65

[2007] UGCommC 65

The court found that the plaintiff's claim was for a liquidated demand and not for special damages as pleaded. The entry of interlocutory judgment was erroneous because the plaint contained both a liquidated claim and a claim for general damages, which does not fall under Order 9 Rule 8. The proper procedure was to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] UGCommC 65
Parties
Plaintiff: Kampala Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd; Defendant: Safeway Pharmacy Ltd
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 743 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Liquidated Demands, Default Judgment, Interest on Debt
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Liquidated Demands Default Judgment Interest on Debt

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kampala Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd

Plaintiff

Safeway Pharmacy Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the claimed sum as a liquidated demand from the defendant.
  2. 2 Whether interlocutory judgment was properly entered given the nature of the claims in the plaint.
  3. 3 Whether interest and costs should be awarded to the plaintiff.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's claim was for a liquidated demand and not for special damages as pleaded. The entry of interlocutory judgment was erroneous because the plaint contained both a liquidated claim and a claim for general damages, which does not fall under Order 9 Rule 8. The proper procedure was to enter judgment under Order 9 Rule 6 for the liquidated demand since the defendant failed to file a defence. The court set aside the interlocutory judgment and the formal proof hearing, and instead entered judgment for the plaintiff for the sum claimed, with interest and costs.

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • Interlocutory judgment and hearing for formal proof set aside.
  • Judgment entered for the plaintiff for Shs.26,927,000.00 under Order 9 Rule 6.