[2025] UGHCLD 83

[2025] UGHCLD 83

The court found that the sale agreement required payment of the balance within two weeks from 11th July 2018, making the deadline 25th July 2018. Since the application was filed nearly seven years later, it is barred by the statutory limitation period under Section 3(1)(a) of the Limitation Act. The applicant's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] UGHCLD 83
Parties
Applicant: Kateregga Ronald; Respondent: Kaweke James; Respondent: Naiga Rebecca; Respondent: Nakanwagi Harriet; Respondent: Katende Derrick; Respondent: Jesse Maurice Kijjambu
Court
HC: Land Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Miscellaneous Cause 180 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Kazaarwe, J
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Deposit of Purchase Price, Sale of Land Contracts
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Limitation Periods Deposit of Purchase Price Sale of Land Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kateregga Ronald

Applicant

Kaweke James

Respondent

Naiga Rebecca

Respondent

Nakanwagi Harriet

Respondent

Katende Derrick

Respondent

Jesse Maurice Kijjambu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant can deposit the outstanding balance of the purchase price in court due to inability to locate the vendors.
  2. 2 Whether the application is barred by the Limitation Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the sale agreement required payment of the balance within two weeks from 11th July 2018, making the deadline 25th July 2018. Since the application was filed nearly seven years later, it is barred by the statutory limitation period under Section 3(1)(a) of the Limitation Act. The applicant's inability to locate the vendors does not extend or suspend the limitation period. The application is therefore dismissed as time-barred.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed as barred under the Limitation Act.
  • No order as to costs.