[2022] UGHCCRD 163

[2022] UGHCCRD 163

The court held that the right to mandatory bail under Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution applies only to accused persons who have been on remand for at least 180 days and have not yet been committed to the High Court for trial. Once an accused is committed to the High Court, the entitlement to mandatory bail...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] UGHCCRD 163
Parties
Applicant: Kawuki Alfred; Respondent: Uganda
Court
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous Application 190 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Mandatory Bail
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Elubu, J
Legal Topics
Bail Application, Mandatory Bail, Remand Periods, Aggravated Defilement
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail Application Mandatory Bail Remand Periods Aggravated Defilement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kawuki Alfred

Applicant

Uganda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Mandatory Bail

  1. 1 Whether the applicant qualifies for mandatory bail under Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution after committal to the High Court.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has met the statutory requirements for release on bail.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the right to mandatory bail under Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution applies only to accused persons who have been on remand for at least 180 days and have not yet been committed to the High Court for trial. Once an accused is committed to the High Court, the entitlement to mandatory bail lapses. In this case, the applicant had already been committed to the High Court on charges of Aggravated Defilement, and therefore, the statutory right to mandatory bail was no longer available to him. The application, being specifically for mandatory bail, could not succeed in light of the committal, and was accordingly dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for mandatory bail is dismissed.