[2005] UGCommC 74

[2005] UGCommC 74

The court found that the Plaintiff was entitled to interest as a discretionary remedy, since it had been kept out of its money due to the Defendant's failure to pay for goods supplied. Although the Defendant argued frustration, this was not pleaded, and liability for the principal sum had already been admitted by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] UGCommC 74
Parties
Plaintiff: Kazinga Channel Office World Ltd; Defendant: Attorney General
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 276 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment After Partial Settlement; Determination of Interest and Costs
Outcome
Judgment for the Plaintiff on interest and costs.
Legal Topics
Contractual Interest, Costs Award, Breach of Contract, Supply of Goods
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Contractual Interest Costs Award Breach of Contract Supply of Goods

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kazinga Channel Office World Ltd

Plaintiff

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment After Partial Settlement; Determination of Interest and Costs

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to interest on the principal sum.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff was entitled to interest as a discretionary remedy, since it had been kept out of its money due to the Defendant's failure to pay for goods supplied. Although the Defendant argued frustration, this was not pleaded, and liability for the principal sum had already been admitted by consent. The court held that the withholding of payment was circumstantial rather than deliberate, but nonetheless awarded interest at 30% per annum from the date of filing the suit until payment in full. On costs, the court applied the general rule that the losing party pays the winner's costs, finding no reason to deny the Plaintiff its costs, which would attract interest at...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Plaintiff on interest and costs.

Orders

  • Interest on the decretal sum at 30% per annum from the date of filing the suit until payment in full is awarded to the Plaintiff.
  • The Plaintiff is awarded the costs of the suit, with such costs to attract interest at the court rate from the date of taxation until payment in full.