[2023] UGHCFD 90

[2023] UGHCFD 90

The court found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the removal of the co-administrator and the amendment of the name on the Letters of Administration. Specifically, there was no deed poll or Gazette notice to support the change of name from Nabukalu Winnie to Kemirembe Winnie, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] UGHCFD 90
Parties
Applicant: Kemirembe Winnie; Respondent: Nalule Justine
Court
HC: Family Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 289 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Katunguka Kitariisibwa, J
Legal Topics
Letters of Administration, Change of Name, Probate Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Letters of Administration Change of Name Probate Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kemirembe Winnie

Applicant

Nalule Justine

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to the remedies sought, specifically removal of a co-administrator and amendment of the name on the Letters of Administration.
  2. 2 Whether sufficient evidence was provided to justify the change of name and removal of the co-administrator.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the removal of the co-administrator and the amendment of the name on the Letters of Administration. Specifically, there was no deed poll or Gazette notice to support the change of name from Nabukalu Winnie to Kemirembe Winnie, and the statutory declaration provided was inadequate for this purpose. Additionally, discrepancies in names and dates of birth, coupled with the absence of a death certificate for the deceased, undermined the credibility of the application. The court held that statutory declarations are only applicable in cases of misspelling, not substantive name changes, and that the burden of...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is hereby dismissed.