[2022] UGHCLD 113
The court found that the applicant and its advocate failed to appear in court and showed no interest in prosecuting the application. The conduct of the applicant's counsel, who did not make any submissions or comments regarding the application, indicated a loss of interest. Therefore, the application was dismissed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] UGHCLD 113
- Parties
- Applicant: Kibaale District Local Government; Respondent: Kakumiro Drivers' Agency
- Court
- HC: Land Division (Uganda)
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application No. 35 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- application dismissed for want of prosecution
- Judges
- Byaruhanga Rugyema, J
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Failure to Prosecute, Adjournment and Nonappearance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kibaale District Local Government
Applicant
Kakumiro Drivers' Agency
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to nonappearance and lack of interest by the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant and its advocate failed to appear in court and showed no interest in prosecuting the application. The conduct of the applicant's counsel, who did not make any submissions or comments regarding the application, indicated a loss of interest. Therefore, the application was dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 17 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Court Disposition
application dismissed for want of prosecution
Orders
- The application is dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 17 Rule 5 Civil Procedure Rules (as amended).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
11 paragraphs
# **THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT MASINDI MISC. APPLICATION NO. 35B OF 2017**
(Arising from Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2016)
## **KIBAALE DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT :::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANT**
### **VERSUS**
### **KAKUMIRO DRIVERS' AGENCY ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT**
### **RULING**
#### *Before: Hon. Justice Byaruhanga Jesse Rugyema*
- [1] This application was filed way back on 25/5/2017 and it was fixed for hearing on the 13/3/18 and to 29/11/19 when the application was adjourned for hearing. Since then, neither party has appeared in court with the view to proceed with the Application. - [2] Today, counsel for the Applicant **Mr. Kamugisha Vincent** of **M/s Kamugisha & Co. Advocates, Kampala** appeared in court in response to **H. C. M. A No. 93 of 2021**(Arising from Civil appeal No.43/16 and M. A No.35 A/17) wherein he had been served for orders that **Civil Appeal No.43/2016** be dismissed for want of prosecution. - [3] In the application **H. C. M. A. No.93/21**, neither the applicant nor its Advocate surfaced for the hearing yet the application was fixed at their instance. It was accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution with costs. **Mr. Kamugisha** for the Respondent in that application who is counsel for the Applicant in this instant application, neither alluded to this application nor showed interest in it. He only alluded to it in his submissions in rejoinder in the appeal but still showed disinterest.
[4] In the premises, the logical conclusion from his conduct is that he has lost interest in this application for he only vanished from court without any comment on the same. As a result, this court is entitled to determine this application by way of dismissing it and it is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution under **O.17 r.5 CPR** ( as amended). **M. A No. 35B/2017** arising from this application is overtaken by events.
**Dated at Masindi this 7th day of April, 2022.**
**Byaruhanga Jesse Rugyema JUDGE.**