[2011] UGHC 169
The court found that the trial Magistrate's decision to close the Defence case without allowing the Defendant to present his evidence or to seek alternative legal representation constituted a denial of the right to a fair hearing. The absence of the Defendant's evidence and exhibits resulted in a miscarriage of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] UGHC 169
- Parties
- Appellant: Kajibwami Micheal; Respondent: Byomuhangi Francis
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal No. 048 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; judgment and orders of the trial court set aside; fresh trial ordered
- Judges
- Kwesiga, J
- Legal Topics
- Right to Be Heard, Fair Trial, Miscarriage of Justice, Adjournment, Defence Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kajibwami Micheal
Appellant
Byomuhangi Francis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial Magistrate erred by closing the Defence case before the Defendant could present his evidence.
- 2 Whether the Defendant was denied the right to a fair hearing.
- 3 Whether the failure to allow the Defendant to engage another Advocate amounted to a miscarriage of justice.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial Magistrate's decision to close the Defence case without allowing the Defendant to present his evidence or to seek alternative legal representation constituted a denial of the right to a fair hearing. The absence of the Defendant's evidence and exhibits resulted in a miscarriage of justice. The court emphasized that the right to be heard is fundamental and cannot be overridden by the conduct of counsel or the frustration of the court. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the judgment and orders of the trial court were set aside, and a fresh trial was ordered before the Grade One Magistrate Court at Kisoro.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; judgment and orders of the trial court set aside; fresh trial ordered
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The judgment and orders of the trial court are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
# THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
# IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KABALE
#### **CIVIL APPEAL NO. 048 OF 2009**
*(From Kisoro Land Claim No 009 of 2007)*
KAJIBWAMI MICHEAL ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::APPELLANT
### **VERSUS**
BYOMUHANGI FRANCIS ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::RESPONDENT
### **BEFORE THE HON. MR. JUSTICE J. W. KWESIGA.**
### **JUDGMENT**
This Appeal arises from a decision of a Grade One Magistrate at Kisoro, delivered on 4th June, 2006, when this Appeal came for hearing this 2nd day of December, 2011. The Appellant was represented by Mr. Beitwenda Dan and the Respondent was represented by Mr. Felix Bakanyebonera. Both the Appellant and the Respondent were present. At the stage of arguing the third and final ground of Appeal that the trial Magistrate omitted consideration of the Defence evidence it became clear that the trial Magistrate closed the Defence case before the Defendant now Appellant could give his Evidence in Defence. Both Advocates conceded that in absence of the Defendants evidence the Defendants intended exhibits had no entry, in the proceedings. I have considered this aspect of the trial, the proceedings clearly show that the Defendant was let down by his Advocate. The appropriate course of action would have been to allow the Defendant an adjournment to engage another Advocate. I appreciate that the Defendant's Advocate appeared to have frustrated and angered the Magistrate but the course action taken to write a Judgment without giving opportunity to the defendant to prepare and defend the suit amounted to denying the Defendant a fair trial/hearing.
The right to be heard is both a constitutional and natural Justice right. There was no evidence that the Defendant had personally refused to defend himself. He was present in court he should have been given another chance rather than closing his defence in the circumstances of this particular case. This caused a miscarriage of Justice in the circumstances, I will
allow the Appeal and set aside the Judgment and orders of the trial court and a fresh trial is ordered before Grade One Magistrate Court at Kisoro.
Dated at Kabale this **2 nd day** of **December, 2011.**
**……………………………**
**J. W. KWESIGA JUDGE 02-12-2011**