[2020] UGCA 2129

[2020] UGCA 2129

The Court determined that the appeal had abated and was moot because the electoral period for which the challenge was brought had expired, nominations for the subsequent parliamentary elections had already closed, and campaigns were underway. Reconstituting a new Coram and rehearing the appeal would serve no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] UGCA 2129
Parties
Appellant: Herbert Tom Kinobere; Respondent: Wairagala Godfrey Kamba
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Election Application No. 53 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Election Petition Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed as abated
Judges
Owiny-Dollo, DCJ, Kakuru, JA, Obura, JA
Legal Topics
Abatement of Election Petition, Mootness of Election Dispute, Parliamentary Election Challenge
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Abatement of Election Petition Mootness of Election Dispute Parliamentary Election Challenge

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Herbert Tom Kinobere

Appellant

Wairagala Godfrey Kamba

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appeal challenging the election results for Kibuuku County in the 2016 parliamentary elections remains justiciable given the lapse of the electoral period.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be reheard by a reconstituted Coram or dismissed as moot.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that the appeal had abated and was moot because the electoral period for which the challenge was brought had expired, nominations for the subsequent parliamentary elections had already closed, and campaigns were underway. Reconstituting a new Coram and rehearing the appeal would serve no practical purpose, as the relief sought could no longer be granted. The question of the appellant's qualification may be addressed in future elections, but the present appeal concerning the 2016 election is no longer justiciable. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed and each party was ordered to bear their own costs.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed as abated

Orders

  • The appeal stands dismissed, having abated.
  • Each party shall bear their own costs in this Court and at the High Court.