[1988] ACHPR 15

[1988] ACHPR 15

The African Commission held that it lacks jurisdiction to consider communications against States that are not parties to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Since Ghana was not a party to the Charter at the time of the communication, the complaint was declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 101 of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1988] ACHPR 15
Parties
Applicant: Dr. Kodji Kofi; Respondent: Republic of Ghana
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Communication 6 of 1988
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility
Outcome
communication declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Communications, State Party Requirement, Human Rights Charter, Arrest and Detention
Source Language
en
Public International Law Admissibility of Communications State Party Requirement Human Rights Charter Arrest and Detention

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. Kodji Kofi

Applicant

Republic of Ghana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication / Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the communication is admissible against a State not party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The African Commission held that it lacks jurisdiction to consider communications against States that are not parties to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Since Ghana was not a party to the Charter at the time of the communication, the complaint was declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 101 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure.

Court Disposition

communication declared inadmissible

Orders

  • The communication is declared inadmissible.