[2016] UGHCCD 75
The defendant was properly served with the plaint on three occasions, including substituted service, but failed to file a written statement of defence as required by law. The plaintiff's claim is for a liquidated sum arising from a land sale agreement, and the evidence supports the plaintiff's entitlement to the balance, interest, general damages, and costs. Under Order 9 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and relevant case law, the court is justified in entering ex-parte judgment for the plaintiff for the sum claimed, interest at 10% per annum from the date of judgment until payment in full, general damages, and costs of the suit.
- Citation
- [2016] UGHCCD 75
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Richard Kyaligaba; Defendant: Godfrey Kaganda
- Court
- HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2016
- Case Number
- HCT–01–CV–CS–0016 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ex Parte Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the plaintiff ex-parte.
- Judges
- Ojok, J
- Legal Topics
- Liquidated Damages, Failure to File Defence, Land Sale Agreement, Service of Process
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Kyaligaba
Plaintiff
Godfrey Kaganda
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ex Parte Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was properly served and failed to file a written statement of defence.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to judgment for the liquidated sum claimed, interest, general damages, and costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was properly served with the plaint on three occasions, including substituted service, but failed to file a written statement of defence as required by law. The plaintiff's claim is for a liquidated sum arising from a land sale agreement, and the evidence supports the plaintiff's entitlement to the balance, interest, general damages, and costs. Under Order 9 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and relevant case law, the court is justified in entering ex-parte judgment for the plaintiff for the sum claimed, interest at 10% per annum from the date of judgment until payment in full, general damages, and costs of the suit.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the plaintiff ex-parte.
Orders
- Defendant shall pay the plaintiff UGX 92,500,000.
- Defendant shall pay interest at 10% per annum from the date of judgment until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment