[2025] UGHCLD 77

[2025] UGHCLD 77

The application was dismissed because neither the applicant nor her counsel appeared for the hearing, and there was no justification for their absence on record. The court relied on Order 9 Rule 22 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which empowers the court to dismiss an application for nonappearance. Costs were awarded...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] UGHCLD 77
Parties
Applicant: Lawoko Winnie Olwe; Respondent: Nalinnya Dorothy; Respondent: Registrar of Land Titles
Court
HC: Land Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Misc Application No. I29 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed for nonappearance
Judges
Asiimwe, J
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Nonappearance, Costs Award, Land Title Registry
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Nonappearance Costs Award Land Title Registry

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lawoko Winnie Olwe

Applicant

Nalinnya Dorothy

Respondent

Registrar of Land Titles

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the application should be heard in the absence of the applicant and her counsel.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be dismissed for nonappearance under Order 9 Rule 22 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because neither the applicant nor her counsel appeared for the hearing, and there was no justification for their absence on record. The court relied on Order 9 Rule 22 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which empowers the court to dismiss an application for nonappearance. Costs were awarded to the second respondent as a consequence of the dismissal.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for nonappearance

Orders

  • The application is dismissed under Order 9 Rule 22 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  • Applicant shall pay costs to the second respondent.