[2019] AfCHPR 92

[2019] AfCHPR 92

The Court determined that, in the interests of justice and to ensure the Applicant's right to a fair trial, leave should be granted to amend the Application and submit further evidence. The Court also granted leave to amend submissions on reparations if necessary. The decision on whether to hold a public hearing was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] AfCHPR 92
Parties
Applicant: John Lazaro; Respondent: United Republic of Tanzania
Court
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Application No. 003/2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Order
Outcome
interlocutory order granting leave to amend and submit further evidence; decision on public hearing reserved
Judges
Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Eno R, Kioko VP, Matusse J, Mengue J, Mukamulisa J, Orè P, Tchikaya J
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Submission of Additional Evidence, Right to Fair Trial
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Amendment of Pleadings Submission of Additional Evidence Right to Fair Trial

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Lazaro

Applicant

United Republic of Tanzania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Order

  1. 1 Whether the Applicant should be granted leave to amend or supplement his Notice of Appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant should be permitted to file further evidence in his defence pursuant to Rule 50 of the Rules of Court.
  3. 3 Whether the Applicant should be allowed additional time to submit documents due to holiday delays.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that, in the interests of justice and to ensure the Applicant's right to a fair trial, leave should be granted to amend the Application and submit further evidence. The Court also granted leave to amend submissions on reparations if necessary. The decision on whether to hold a public hearing was reserved, pending further developments. The Respondent State's lack of response did not preclude the granting of the Applicant's requests, as the procedural rules empower the Court to act to safeguard fair trial rights and proper adjudication.

Court Disposition

interlocutory order granting leave to amend and submit further evidence; decision on public hearing reserved

Orders

  • The Applicant is granted leave to amend the Application and submit further evidence within fifteen (15) days of notification of this Order.
  • The Applicant is granted leave to amend submissions on reparations within fifteen (15) days of notification of this Order if necessary.