[2008] UGHC 114

[2008] UGHC 114

The court found that the defendant failed to supply the tractor as agreed and did not refund the full purchase price. The only evidence before the court was that of the second plaintiff, which was accepted as uncontroverted. The sum claimed in the plaint was UGX 7,500,000, and the plaintiffs were bound by this...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] UGHC 114
Parties
Plaintiff: Lubang Benedict; Plaintiff: Olal Obong Andrew; Defendant: Komakech Richard Ogaba
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No. 37 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment_for_plaintiff
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Sale of Goods, Refund of Purchase Price
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Breach of Contract Sale of Goods Refund of Purchase Price

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lubang Benedict

Plaintiff

Olal Obong Andrew

Plaintiff

Komakech Richard Ogaba

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant breached the contract for supply of a tractor by failing to deliver the tractor as agreed.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a refund of the purchase price paid for the tractor.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to general damages for breach of contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant failed to supply the tractor as agreed and did not refund the full purchase price. The only evidence before the court was that of the second plaintiff, which was accepted as uncontroverted. The sum claimed in the plaint was UGX 7,500,000, and the plaintiffs were bound by this amount. No evidence was adduced for general damages, so none were awarded. The court held that the plaintiffs were entitled to a refund of UGX 7,500,000, with interest at the commercial rate of 22% per annum from 1st December 2005 until payment in full, as the tractor was intended for commercial agricultural use. Costs of the suit were also awarded to the plaintiffs.

Court Disposition

judgment_for_plaintiff

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the plaintiffs against the defendant for UGX 7,500,000.
  • Interest at 22% per annum on UGX 7,500,000 from 1st December 2005 until payment in full.