[2004] UGHC 35

[2004] UGHC 35

The court found that the defendant, Uganda Railways Corporation, was in breach of the contract of carriage by failing to deliver the goods as agreed. The evidence, including the police report and the circumstances of delivery, established that the container was empty upon arrival and that the defendant could not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] UGHC 35
Parties
Plaintiff: Francis Drake Lubega; Plaintiff: Tesco International Ltd; Defendant: Uganda Railways Corporation
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No.719 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiffs
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Carriage of Goods, Common Carrier Liability, Special Damages
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Tort Law Breach of Contract Carriage of Goods Common Carrier Liability Special Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Drake Lubega

Plaintiff

Tesco International Ltd

Plaintiff

Uganda Railways Corporation

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is liable for the missing goods.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the remedies sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant, Uganda Railways Corporation, was in breach of the contract of carriage by failing to deliver the goods as agreed. The evidence, including the police report and the circumstances of delivery, established that the container was empty upon arrival and that the defendant could not satisfactorily explain the loss or rebut the presumption of negligence. The defendant's reliance on flat-rate carriage and lack of verification did not absolve it of liability as a common carrier. The court held that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover the value of the missing goods, freight charges, and a reasonable profit margin, as these losses were a direct and foreseeable...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiffs

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiffs $40,895 being the value of the goods, freight, and profit margin.
  • Interest on the above sum at 15% per annum from the date of breach until payment in full.