[2008] UGCommC 14

[2008] UGCommC 14

The defendant breached the contract by failing to install and test the machine as agreed, and by delivering a machine that was not in good working condition, contrary to the express guarantee and implied statutory conditions under the Sale of Goods Act. The evidence established that the machine was obsolete, faulty,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] UGCommC 14
Parties
Plaintiff: Hajji Asadu Lutale; Defendant: Micheal Ssegawa
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 292 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
suit allowed in part
Legal Topics
Sale of Goods, Contractual Breach, Merchantable Quality, Fitness for Purpose
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Sale of Goods Contractual Breach Merchantable Quality Fitness for Purpose

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hajji Asadu Lutale

Plaintiff

Micheal Ssegawa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there was non-performance of the contract by the parties and if so, by who?.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant breached the contract by failing to install and test the machine as agreed, and by delivering a machine that was not in good working condition, contrary to the express guarantee and implied statutory conditions under the Sale of Goods Act. The evidence established that the machine was obsolete, faulty, and unfit for its intended purpose, entitling the plaintiff to reject it and demand a refund. The defendant's attempt to shift blame to the plaintiff was unsupported and illogical. The plaintiff proved entitlement to special damages for the purchase price and penalty, and general damages for breach. Claims for undocumented expenses and rent were disallowed for lack of proof...

Court Disposition

suit allowed in part

Orders

  • Special damages of UGX 16,500,000 awarded to the plaintiff.
  • General damages of UGX 5,000,000 awarded to the plaintiff.