[2023] UGHCLD 61

[2023] UGHCLD 61

The applicant was not a party to the original suit and therefore lacks locus standi to seek revision. Even if locus standi existed, the circumstances do not meet the requirements for revision under Section 83 of the Civil Procedure Act, as the matter was concluded by consent and there is no evidence of irregular...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] UGHCLD 61
Parties
Applicant: Magembe Peter; Respondent: Ssegujja Richard
Court
HC: Land Division (Uganda)
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Revision 8 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Kazaarwe, J
Legal Topics
Revision Jurisdiction, Locus Standi, Consent Judgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Revision Jurisdiction Locus Standi Consent Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Magembe Peter

Applicant

Ssegujja Richard

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has locus standi to seek revision of the lower court's decision.
  2. 2 Whether the circumstances of the case qualify for revision under Section 83 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant was not a party to the original suit and therefore lacks locus standi to seek revision. Even if locus standi existed, the circumstances do not meet the requirements for revision under Section 83 of the Civil Procedure Act, as the matter was concluded by consent and there is no evidence of irregular exercise of jurisdiction. Revision is not the correct procedural remedy in these circumstances.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • This application is dismissed with no order as to costs.