[2017] UGCA 143

[2017] UGCA 143

The appeal was withdrawn by mutual consent of both parties in accordance with Rule 94(3) of The Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions. The court accepted the withdrawal and ordered that each party bears its own costs, as agreed. No further adjudication on the merits of the appeal was necessary due to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] UGCA 143
Parties
Appellant: Mbiire Julius; Respondent: David Bliss; Respondent: Mary Bliss; Respondent: Beebwa Wilson
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Appeal No. 36 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Withdrawal by Consent
Outcome
appeal withdrawn by consent
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Appeal, Costs Orders, Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Withdrawal of Appeal Costs Orders Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mbiire Julius

Appellant

David Bliss

Respondent

Mary Bliss

Respondent

Beebwa Wilson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Withdrawal by Consent

  1. 1 Whether the parties have validly consented to the withdrawal of Civil Appeal No. 36 of 2015.
  2. 2 Whether costs should be awarded or each party should bear its own costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was withdrawn by mutual consent of both parties in accordance with Rule 94(3) of The Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions. The court accepted the withdrawal and ordered that each party bears its own costs, as agreed. No further adjudication on the merits of the appeal was necessary due to the withdrawal by consent.

Court Disposition

appeal withdrawn by consent

Orders

  • Appeal No. 36 of 2015 is withdrawn from court.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs.