[2019] EACJ 46

[2019] EACJ 46

The court held that, despite the strength of the Applicants' arguments, the gravity of the allegations and the interests of justice require that both parties be heard before any interim orders are granted. The court emphasized that ex parte relief is exceptional and should only be granted when it is just to do so....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] EACJ 46
Parties
Applicant: Freeman A. Mbowe & 3 Others; Respondent: Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania
Court
East African Court of Justice
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Interim Orders
Outcome
ex parte application for interim orders disallowed; application to proceed inter partes
Judges
Jundu JA, Mugenyi PJ, Ngiye JA, Ntezilyayo DPJ, Nyachae JA
Legal Topics
Interim Orders, Ex Parte Applications, Rule 73 Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Interim Orders Ex Parte Applications Rule 73 Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Freeman A. Mbowe & 3 Others

Applicant

Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Interim Orders

  1. 1 Whether the circumstances justify granting interim orders on an ex parte basis rather than inter partes.
  2. 2 Whether the justice of the case requires hearing both parties before granting interim relief.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, despite the strength of the Applicants' arguments, the gravity of the allegations and the interests of justice require that both parties be heard before any interim orders are granted. The court emphasized that ex parte relief is exceptional and should only be granted when it is just to do so. In this case, the court was not satisfied that the circumstances warranted ex parte orders and directed that the application be served on the Respondent for an inter partes hearing.

Court Disposition

ex parte application for interim orders disallowed; application to proceed inter partes

Orders

  • The ex parte application for interim orders is disallowed.
  • Applicants are directed to serve the application for interim orders upon the Respondent.