[2007] UGCommC 55

[2007] UGCommC 55

The court found that the defendant's liability for the outstanding debt was determined by its failure to file a defence, resulting in interlocutory judgment for the plaintiff. The evidence established that the defendant obtained goods on credit, made partial payment, but left the balance unpaid. The plaintiff was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] UGCommC 55
Parties
Plaintiff: Meta Products (U) Ltd; Defendant: People Health Care
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 83 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Formal Proof of Damages
Outcome
judgment_for_plaintiff
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Special Damages, General Damages, Interest on Judgment, Costs of Suit
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Breach of Contract Special Damages General Damages Interest on Judgment Costs of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Meta Products (U) Ltd

Plaintiff

People Health Care

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Formal Proof of Damages

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding debt for pharmaceutical goods supplied to the defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to general damages for breach of contract.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest and costs of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant's liability for the outstanding debt was determined by its failure to file a defence, resulting in interlocutory judgment for the plaintiff. The evidence established that the defendant obtained goods on credit, made partial payment, but left the balance unpaid. The plaintiff was entitled to special damages for the unpaid sum. Regarding general damages, the court held that denial of use of money and inconvenience suffered justified an award, even though no specific amount was proposed by the plaintiff. The court exercised discretion to award Shs.500,000 as general damages. Both special and general damages were to attract interest at 25% per annum from the...

Court Disposition

judgment_for_plaintiff

Orders

  • Special damages: U Shs.6,030,220 awarded to the plaintiff.
  • General damages: U Shs.500,000 awarded to the plaintiff.