[2012] AfCHPR 6
The Court found that the Respondent's response setting out preliminary objections did not comply with Rule 52(4) of the Rules of Court, as it failed to provide the necessary details required by the Rule. The Court ordered the Respondent to submit a compliant response within 30 days and allowed the Applicant to reply...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] AfCHPR 6
- Parties
- Applicant: Urban Mkandawire; Respondent: Republic of Malawi
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2012
- Case Number
- Application No. 003/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- interlocutory_order
- Legal Topics
- Right to Fair Hearing, Court Procedure, Preliminary Objections
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Urban Mkandawire
Applicant
Republic of Malawi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent's preliminary objections comply with Rule 52(4) of the Rules of Court.
- 2 Whether the Respondent must provide further details to satisfy procedural requirements.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Respondent's response setting out preliminary objections did not comply with Rule 52(4) of the Rules of Court, as it failed to provide the necessary details required by the Rule. The Court ordered the Respondent to submit a compliant response within 30 days and allowed the Applicant to reply within 30 days of receipt of the Respondent's compliant response. The decision ensures procedural fairness and adherence to the Court's rules, safeguarding the right to a fair hearing and proper adjudication of preliminary objections.
Court Disposition
interlocutory_order
Orders
- The Respondent is called upon to comply with Rule 52(4) of the Rules of Court within 30 days of receipt of this order.
- The Applicant may respond to the Respondent's compliant response within 30 days of receipt thereof from the Registrar.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
**AFRICAN UNION** الاتحاد الأقريئي
UNION AFRICAINE
**UNIÃO AFRICANA**
## AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS
COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME ET DES PEUPLES
IN THE MATTER OF
**URBAN MKANDAWIRE**
V.
# THE REPUBLIC OF MALAWI
APPLICATION No. 003/2011
**ORDER**
The Court composed of: Gérard NIYUNGEKO, President; Sophia A. B. AKUFFO, Vice-President; Bernard M. NGOEPE, Modibo T. GUINDO, Fatsah OUGUERGOUZ, Augustino S. L. RAMADHANI. Elsie $\mathsf{N}_\cdot$ THOMPSON and Sylvain ORE- Judges; and Robert ENO- Registrar,
## In the matter of
### **URBAN MKANDAWIRE**
#### V.
#### REPUBLIC OF MALAWI
Hereby decides as follows:
Having considered the Respondent's response dated 9 January 2012, in response to the application submitted by the Applicant, Mr. Urban Mkandawire dated 13 March, 2012, as well as the skeleton arguments of the Respondent, the Court rules that:
(a) The Respondent's response setting out its preliminary objections in terms of Rule 52(4) of the Rules of Court does not comply with the said Rule in that it does not set out the details required by the Rule;
(b) The Respondent is accordingly called upon to comply with Rule 52(4) within 30 days of the receipt hereof; and
$\mathbb{R}$ $\mathbb{R}$
(c) The Applicant, if so minded, should respond to the Respondent's response referred to in (b) above within 30 days of receipt thereof from the Registrar.
Done at Arusha, this thirty day of March, in the year Two Thousand and Twelve, in English and French, the English text being authoritative.
Signed:
Gérard NIYUNGEKO, President
Robert ENO, Registrar
