[1935] EACA 58
The Court of Appeal determined that it has jurisdiction to entertain an application for stay of proceedings in bankruptcy matters pending appeal. This is based on the broad language of Article 2 of the Eastern African Court of Appeal Order in Council, 1921, which empowers the Court to make any order necessary to do justice in matters before it. The Court found that the Supreme Court's power to grant a stay does not exclude the appellate court's jurisdiction, especially in the absence of any statutory provision requiring the applicant to first apply to the lower court. The authorities cited, including Cropper v. Smith, support the view that both courts have concurrent jurisdiction unless...
- Citation
- [1935] EACA 58
- Parties
- Applicant: Jan Mohamed; Respondent: T. B. Lobo
- Court
- East African Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1935
- Case Number
- C.A. 5/1935.
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay of proceedings granted conditionally.
- Judges
- Sheridan, P, Webb, J
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Proceedings, Stay of Proceedings, Appellate Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jan Mohamed
Applicant
T. B. Lobo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to entertain an application for stay of proceedings in bankruptcy pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the existence of Supreme Court power to grant a stay excludes the Court of Appeal's jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal determined that it has jurisdiction to entertain an application for stay of proceedings in bankruptcy matters pending appeal. This is based on the broad language of Article 2 of the Eastern African Court of Appeal Order in Council, 1921, which empowers the Court to make any order necessary to do justice in matters before it. The Court found that the Supreme Court's power to grant a stay does not exclude the appellate court's jurisdiction, especially in the absence of any statutory provision requiring the applicant to first apply to the lower court. The authorities cited, including Cropper v. Smith, support the view that both courts have concurrent jurisdiction unless...
Court Disposition
Application for stay of proceedings granted conditionally.
Orders
- A conditional order for stay of proceedings was made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment