[2013] AfCHPR 3

[2013] AfCHPR 3

The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights determined that it lacks jurisdiction to hear appeals from domestic courts, including the Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal. The Protocol restricts the Court's jurisdiction to cases concerning the interpretation and application of the Charter, the Protocol, and other relevant human rights instruments, but does not confer appellate powers over domestic judicial decisions. As the Applicant's case is an appeal against a domestic court decision, the application falls outside the Court's competence and must be struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Citation
[2013] AfCHPR 3
Parties
Applicant: Ernest Francis Mtingwi; Respondent: Republic of Malawi
Court
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Judgment Date
15 March 2013
Case Number
Application No. 001/2013
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Application / Jurisdictional Ruling
Outcome
application_struck_out_for_want_of_jurisdiction
Judges
Aba J, Akuffo P, Eno R, Guissè J, Kioko J, Ngoepe J, Niyungeko J, Orė J, Ouguergouz VP, Ramadhani J, Thompson J
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Regional Courts, Appellate Review Limitations, Employment Contracts, Unlawful Termination, Assessment of Damages
Source Language
English
Administrative Law Jurisdiction of Regional Courts Appellate Review Limitations Employment Contracts Unlawful Termination Assessment of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ernest Francis Mtingwi

Applicant

Republic of Malawi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Application / Jurisdictional Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a domestic court decision?
  2. 2 Can the Applicant seek a reversal of the Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal's decision before the African Court?
  3. 3 Is the claim for omitted terminal benefits within the competence of the African Court?

Ratio Decidendi

The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights determined that it lacks jurisdiction to hear appeals from domestic courts, including the Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal. The Protocol restricts the Court's jurisdiction to cases concerning the interpretation and application of the Charter, the Protocol, and other relevant human rights instruments, but does not confer appellate powers over domestic judicial decisions. As the Applicant's case is an appeal against a domestic court decision, the application falls outside the Court's competence and must be struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

application_struck_out_for_want_of_jurisdiction

Orders

  • The application instituted by Mr Ernest Francis Mtingwi against the Republic of Malawi is struck out for want of jurisdiction.