[2021] UGSC 39
The Supreme Court found that its previous order, which directed the return of recovered property to the liquidator, was made in error due to an accidental slip. The Court clarified that its intention was for the property or its value to be returned to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation), not to the liquidator...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] UGSC 39
- Parties
- Applicant: Mukwano Enterprises Limited; Respondent: Ranchhobhbhai Shivabhai Patel; Respondent: Henry Wambuga (Liquidator of African Textile Mill Limited)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Uganda
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Civil Application 16 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Correction of Judgment/order Under Rule 2(2) & 35(1) of the Judicature (supreme Court Rules) Directions
- Outcome
- Order corrected to direct payment to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation); liquidator removed; shareholders to complete liquidation and recover decreed property/value.
- Judges
- Opio-Aweri, JSC, Mugamba, JSC, Muhanguzi, JSC, Tuhaise, JSC, Mike Chibita, JSC
- Legal Topics
- Correction of Judgment, Liquidation Procedure, Shareholders Derivative Suit, Fraud by Liquidator
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mukwano Enterprises Limited
Applicant
Ranchhobhbhai Shivabhai Patel
Respondent
Henry Wambuga (Liquidator of African Textile Mill Limited)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Correction of Judgment/order Under Rule 2(2) & 35(1) of the Judicature (supreme Court Rules) Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court's previous order erroneously directed the return of recovered property to the liquidator who perpetrated fraud against the company.
- 2 Whether the Court should correct its order to ensure the property or its value is returned to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation) rather than the liquidator.
- 3 Whether the removal of the liquidator is necessary to give effect to the Court's intention and prevent abuse of process.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court found that its previous order, which directed the return of recovered property to the liquidator, was made in error due to an accidental slip. The Court clarified that its intention was for the property or its value to be returned to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation), not to the liquidator who had been found to have perpetrated fraud against the company. The Court exercised its powers under Rule 35(1) to correct the order and under Rule 2(2) to make further orders necessary to achieve justice, including the removal of the liquidator and directing shareholders to complete the liquidation process and recover what was decreed to the company. The correction and...
Court Disposition
Order corrected to direct payment to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation); liquidator removed; shareholders to complete liquidation and recover decreed property/value.
Orders
- Order 3 corrected: In the event the return of the plant and machinery is not immediately practicable, the Applicant shall pay to African Textile Mills Limited (in liquidation), the equivalent of Uganda shillings 11,944,127,000 per valuation certificate dated 14th May, 2004 being the replacement value of the plant...
- The 2nd respondent, Mr. Sylvester Henry Wambuga, is removed as liquidator of African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation) with immediate effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
#### THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA
# (CORAM: OPIO-AWERI, MUGAMBA, MUHANGUZI, TUHAISE, CHIBITA, JJ. S. C)
## CIVIL APPLICATION No. 16 of 2019
# MUKWANO ENTERPRISES LIMITED::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
#### AND
#### 1. RANCHHOBHAI SHIVABHAI PATEL
# 2. HENRY WAMBUGA (LIQUIDATOR OF
# AFRICAN TEXTILE MILL LIMITED):::::::::::::::RESPONDENTS
(Correction of errors under rule 2(2) & 35(1) of the Judicature (Supreme Court Rules) Directions arising from the ruling by the Court in Supreme Court Civil Application No. 16 of 2019.)
#### DECISION OF THE COURT.
Under rule 35(1) of the Judicature (Supreme Court Rules) Directions, it is provided as follows:
"A clerical or arithmetical mistake in any judgment of the court or any error arising in it from an accidental slip or omission may, at any time whether before or after the judgment has been embodied in an order, be corrected by court, either of its own motion or on application of any interested person so as to give effect to what was the intention of the Court when judgment was **given.**" (Emphasis ours)
$\mathbf{1}$
The Court's ruling in respect of Civil Application No. 16 of 2019, stated as follows:
- 1. The judgment of the Honourable Court in Civil Appeal No. 6 of 2017, is maintained subject to the following clarifications. - 2. The Applicant immediately returns to $M/s$ African Textile Mills Ltd (In Liquidation), the plant, machinery that was in the factory at the time it took over. - 3. In the event, the return of the plant and machinery is not immediately practicable, the Applicant shall pay to the 1st respondent the equivalent $of$ Uganda **Shillings** 11,944,127,000/= per valuation certificate dated $14^{th}$ May, 2004, being the replacement value of the plant and machinery.
There was an accidental slip in this order. The Court intended for the recovered properties that had been unlawfully disposed of by Mr. Sylvester Henry Wambuga (the Liquidator) to be returned to African Textiles Mills Ltd (in liquidation) on whose behalf the shareholders' derivative suit was brought.
Similarly, it was never the intention of the Court to return the same properties recovered herein to the liquidator who perpetrated the fraud against African Textile Mills Limited (in liquidation). This would be a mockery of the justice system.
Accordingly, Order 3 is corrected to read as follows:
In the event the return of the plant and machinery is not immediately practicable, the Applicant shall pay to African Textile Mills Limited (in liquidation), the equivalent of Uganda shillings 11,944,127,000 per valuation certificate dated 14<sup>th</sup> May, 2004 being the replacement value of the plant and machinery.
The Court is permitted under rule 2(2) of the Court's rules to make such orders as may be necessary for achieving the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of court. We therefore, make the following additional orders to give effect to the Court's decision.
- 5. The 2<sup>nd</sup> respondent, Mr. Sylvester Henry Wambuga, is removed as liquidator of African Textiles Mills Ltd (in liquidation) with immediate effect. - 6. We hereby direct that the shareholders take appropriate steps to complete the liquidation process and also recover what has been decreed to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation) in the judgment of this Court.
Dated at Kampala this .................................... Hon. Justice Rubby Opio-Aweri JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
$\bigvee$
Hon. Justice Paul K. Mugamba JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT

Hon. Justice Ezekiel Muhanguzi
$\cdots$
. . . . . . . . . . . .
.......................................
## JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
$\sqrt{N}$
Hon. Justice Percy Night Tuhaise
### JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
$\mathbb{Z}$
Hon. Justice Mike J. Chibita **JUSTICE OF SUPREMEC COURT**