[1990] UGHC 2

[1990] UGHC 2

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case with a probability of success, particularly due to the evidence that the mortgage was executed when the properties were expropriated and that the repossession certificate had been cancelled. The court held that the applicant would suffer...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1990] UGHC 2
Parties
Applicant: Muljibhai Madhvani & Company Ltd; Respondent: Madhvani International Limited; Respondent: Barclays Bank of Uganda Ltd
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No.607 of 1990
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
application allowed; temporary injunction granted
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Mortgage Disputes, Expropriated Properties, Status Quo Preservation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Temporary Injunctions Mortgage Disputes Expropriated Properties Status Quo Preservation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Muljibhai Madhvani & Company Ltd

Applicant

Madhvani International Limited

Respondent

Barclays Bank of Uganda Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case with a probability of success in the main suit.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant will suffer irreparable injury if the temporary injunction is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience favors granting the temporary injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case with a probability of success, particularly due to the evidence that the mortgage was executed when the properties were expropriated and that the repossession certificate had been cancelled. The court held that the applicant would suffer irreparable injury if the injunction was not granted, as the properties were essential for housing workers and alternative accommodation was scarce. The balance of convenience favored the applicant, as the inconvenience to the respondent from being denied security was less than the potential harm to the applicant. Despite procedural irregularities in citing the applicable rules, the...

Court Disposition

application allowed; temporary injunction granted

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is granted restraining the respondents from selling, disposing of, or interfering with the applicant's possession and ownership of the suit properties until the dispute is finalized.