[2016] AfCHPR 66

[2016] AfCHPR 66

The Court held that the withdrawal by the Republic of Rwanda of its declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol does not affect the admissibility or continuation of applications already filed before the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights. The Court reasoned that the withdrawal cannot have retroactive...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] AfCHPR 66
Parties
Applicant: Laurent Munyandilikirwa; Respondent: Republic of Rwanda
Court
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Application 023/2015
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Order on Effect of Respondent's Withdrawal of Declaration Under Article 34(6)
Outcome
Application to suspend proceedings denied; Court will continue examining the application.
Judges
Ramadhani P
Legal Topics
African Court Jurisdiction, Withdrawal of Declaration, Individual Access to Court
Source Language
en
Public International Law Constitutional Law African Court Jurisdiction Withdrawal of Declaration Individual Access to Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Laurent Munyandilikirwa

Applicant

Republic of Rwanda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Interlocutory Order on Effect of Respondent's Withdrawal of Declaration Under Article 34(6)

  1. 1 Whether the withdrawal by the Republic of Rwanda of its declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol affects pending applications before the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights.
  2. 2 Whether proceedings in cases already filed against Rwanda should be suspended following the withdrawal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the withdrawal by the Republic of Rwanda of its declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol does not affect the admissibility or continuation of applications already filed before the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights. The Court reasoned that the withdrawal cannot have retroactive effect and does not suspend or terminate proceedings in cases that were instituted prior to the withdrawal. This position is consistent with the Court's earlier ruling in Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v Republic of Rwanda, Application No 003/2014, where it was unanimously decided that the withdrawal of Rwanda's declaration did not affect pending cases. Accordingly, the Court decided...

Court Disposition

Application to suspend proceedings denied; Court will continue examining the application.

Orders

  • The Court unanimously decides to continue examining this Application.