[2019] UGHCCD 269
The court found that the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory statutory requirements for filing an appeal. The notice of appeal, while expressing an intention to appeal, did not constitute a valid commencement of an appeal in the absence of a memorandum of appeal filed within the prescribed 30-day period. The memorandum of appeal was filed more than eight months after the judgment, without any application for extension of time or leave of court. The Registrar's endorsement of the memorandum of appeal and the parties' subsequent submissions could not cure the fundamental illegality. The court held that the appeal was incompetent and must be dismissed, as compliance with statutory...
- Citation
- [2019] UGHCCD 269
- Parties
- Appellant: Yokosofati Muwonge; Respondent: Godfrey Matovu Salongo
- Court
- HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2019
- Case Number
- HCT – 14 – LD – CA – 0098/2018.
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed as incompetent
- Judges
- Mutonyi, J
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Timelines, Memorandum of Appeal, Court Registry Practice, Extension of Time
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yokosofati Muwonge
Appellant
Godfrey Matovu Salongo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was properly and competently filed within the statutory period as required by law.
- 2 Whether the filing of a notice of appeal without a memorandum of appeal is sufficient to commence an appeal.
- 3 Whether the court can entertain an appeal filed out of time without leave of court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory statutory requirements for filing an appeal. The notice of appeal, while expressing an intention to appeal, did not constitute a valid commencement of an appeal in the absence of a memorandum of appeal filed within the prescribed 30-day period. The memorandum of appeal was filed more than eight months after the judgment, without any application for extension of time or leave of court. The Registrar's endorsement of the memorandum of appeal and the parties' subsequent submissions could not cure the fundamental illegality. The court held that the appeal was incompetent and must be dismissed, as compliance with statutory...
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed as incompetent
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed for being incompetent.
- No order is made as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment