[2004] UGCommC 10

[2004] UGCommC 10

The application for an interlocutory order restraining the respondent from purchasing the applicants' tobacco is not supported by the cited statutory provisions. Section 33 of the Judicature Act is a general provision and does not provide a basis for interlocutory relief in this context. Section 64 of the Civil...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] UGCommC 10
Parties
Applicant: Sedrach Mwajakubi; Applicant: Mukitale Asiimwe; Applicant: Joshua Byangire; Applicant: Fenakansi Byabesiza; Applicant: Solomon Kiiza; Respondent: British American Tobacco Uganda Ltd
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-MA 284 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunction, Contract Farming Disputes, Remedies Under Judicature Act, Temporary Injunction Criteria
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Interlocutory Injunction Contract Farming Disputes Remedies Under Judicature Act Temporary Injunction Criteria

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sedrach Mwajakubi

Applicant

Mukitale Asiimwe

Applicant

Joshua Byangire

Applicant

Fenakansi Byabesiza

Applicant

Solomon Kiiza

Applicant

British American Tobacco Uganda Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an interlocutory order restraining the respondent from purchasing their tobacco until court determines a fair price.
  2. 2 Whether Section 33 of the Judicature Act, Sections 64 and 98 of the Civil Procedure Act provide a legal basis for the relief sought.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants have demonstrated substantial loss or risk to the ends of justice justifying the grant of a temporary injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

The application for an interlocutory order restraining the respondent from purchasing the applicants' tobacco is not supported by the cited statutory provisions. Section 33 of the Judicature Act is a general provision and does not provide a basis for interlocutory relief in this context. Section 64 of the Civil Procedure Act only applies where temporary injunctions are specifically prescribed, which is not the case here. Section 98 recognizes inherent jurisdiction, but the applicants have not demonstrated circumstances warranting its exercise. The applicants have failed to show how the order sought would prevent multiplicity of proceedings or preserve their final remedy. The tobacco in...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs.