[2025] UGHC 367

[2025] UGHC 367

The court found that the application was made in good faith to resolve genuine disputes regarding the paternity of certain beneficiaries, which is essential for the proper administration and distribution of the estate. All parties agreed to the necessity of a DNA test, and the absence of stored genetic material from...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] UGHC 367
Parties
Applicant: Kiwalabye Absolom; Applicant: Administrators of the estate of the late Nsereko George; Respondent: Kabenge Ronald; Respondent: Kayongo Andrew; Respondent: Sebuliba Godfrey; Respondent: 1st Respondent (unnamed); Respondent: 7th Respondent (unnamed); Respondent: 6th Respondent (unnamed)
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 317 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for DNA Testing and Exhumation
Outcome
application granted
Judges
Bukirwa, J
Legal Topics
Paternity Disputes, Estate Administration, Dna Testing, Exhumation Orders
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Paternity Disputes Estate Administration Dna Testing Exhumation Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kiwalabye Absolom

Applicant

Administrators of the estate of the late Nsereko George

Applicant

Kabenge Ronald

Respondent

Kayongo Andrew

Respondent

Sebuliba Godfrey

Respondent

1st Respondent (unnamed)

Respondent

7th Respondent (unnamed)

Respondent

6th Respondent (unnamed)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for DNA Testing and Exhumation

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have established sufficient grounds for a court order directing a sibling kinship or paternity DNA test among the alleged children of the late Nsereko George.
  2. 2 Whether exhumation of the deceased's remains is justified to obtain samples for DNA testing.
  3. 3 Whether the costs of the DNA test and exhumation should be charged on the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application was made in good faith to resolve genuine disputes regarding the paternity of certain beneficiaries, which is essential for the proper administration and distribution of the estate. All parties agreed to the necessity of a DNA test, and the absence of stored genetic material from the deceased made exhumation the only viable option. The court balanced the cultural and ethical reluctance to disturb the deceased's remains against the compelling need to establish parentage for estate administration. Given the consensus among parties and the interests of justice, the court held that exhumation and DNA testing were justified and necessary. The process must...

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • An order for exhumation of the deceased to determine parentage is granted.
  • The remains of the late Nsereko George shall be exhumed to obtain samples for conducting the paternity examination.