[1992] UGHC 3

[1992] UGHC 3

The court held that the application was wrongly brought under Order 43 rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules and by Notice of Motion, whereas the dispute arose under an agreement and was governed by the Arbitration Act and Rules. Rule 16 of the Arbitration Rules mandates that such applications be brought by chamber...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1992] UGHC 3
Parties
Applicant: Njeru Town Council; Respondent: Nyanza Textile Industries Ltd
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Misc. Appl. No. 19 of 1992
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
application struck out
Legal Topics
Arbitration Procedure, Affidavit Requirements, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Arbitration Procedure Affidavit Requirements Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njeru Town Council

Applicant

Nyanza Textile Industries Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the application to appoint an arbitrator was properly brought under the Civil Procedure Rules instead of the Arbitration Act and Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the supporting affidavit was defective for containing hearsay and lacking disclosure of the source of information.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the application was wrongly brought under Order 43 rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules and by Notice of Motion, whereas the dispute arose under an agreement and was governed by the Arbitration Act and Rules. Rule 16 of the Arbitration Rules mandates that such applications be brought by chamber summons. The court found that the mandatory procedural requirements were violated, rendering the application incompetent. On the issue of the affidavit, the court noted that while affidavits may contain information, the source must be disclosed if not based on personal knowledge. However, in this case, there was no evidence to rebut the deponent's claim of personal knowledge, so...

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The application is struck out with costs to the respondent.