[2018] UGCA 73

[2018] UGCA 73

The court found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient cause for the extension of time to file the memorandum of appeal. There was no evidence that a notice of appeal was properly lodged or served on the respondents as required by the rules. The applicants also failed to prove that the letter requesting...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] UGCA 73
Parties
Applicant: Nyirababore Vannis; Applicant: Gakuru; Respondent: Nyakubanza Sarafina; Respondent: Kwigeze Maria; Respondent: Mugisha Stella
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Application No. 0037 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Memorandum of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
Egonda-Ntende, JA
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Service of Process, Appeal Lodgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Service of Process Appeal Lodgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nyirababore Vannis

Applicant

Gakuru

Applicant

Nyakubanza Sarafina

Respondent

Kwigeze Maria

Respondent

Mugisha Stella

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Memorandum of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file a memorandum of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether a notice of appeal was properly lodged and served as required by law.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants complied with mandatory procedural requirements for instituting an appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient cause for the extension of time to file the memorandum of appeal. There was no evidence that a notice of appeal was properly lodged or served on the respondents as required by the rules. The applicants also failed to prove that the letter requesting certified copies of proceedings was served on the respondents, which is a mandatory requirement for excluding time spent waiting for the record. The court emphasized that compliance with procedural rules regarding lodging and service of the notice of appeal is a prerequisite for the competent institution of an appeal. In the absence of such compliance, the court could not...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file the memorandum of appeal is dismissed.
  • The applicants shall pay the costs of this application to the respondents.