[2008] UGHC 89

[2008] UGHC 89

The court found that the plaintiff and first defendant entered into a written agreement whereby the plaintiff financed the construction of three classrooms, expecting repayment from the contract price paid by Kitgum District Local Government. The first defendant received the full contract sum but failed to reimburse...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] UGHC 89
Parties
Plaintiff: Ochan Justine; Defendant: Ocen Moris; Defendant: Ereo Moses O.
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No. 133 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant; suit dismissed against the second defendant.
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Special Damages, General Damages, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Breach of Contract Special Damages General Damages Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ochan Justine

Plaintiff

Ocen Moris

Defendant

Ereo Moses O.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff advanced money to the defendants for their classroom construction project on the basis that the advanced money was to be repaid within a particular period or within a reasonable period.
  2. 2 Whether the advanced money is still due and owing.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff has suffered any damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff and first defendant entered into a written agreement whereby the plaintiff financed the construction of three classrooms, expecting repayment from the contract price paid by Kitgum District Local Government. The first defendant received the full contract sum but failed to reimburse the plaintiff. There was no evidence that the plaintiff advanced money to the second defendant or that the second defendant undertook to repay any money. The court held that the plaintiff proved his claim against the first defendant on a balance of probabilities but failed to establish liability against the second defendant. The plaintiff was entitled to recover the contract...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant; suit dismissed against the second defendant.

Orders

  • The first defendant shall pay the plaintiff UGX 19,488,000 as special damages.
  • The first defendant shall pay the plaintiff UGX 5,000,000 as general damages.