[1994] UGHC 94

[1994] UGHC 94

The applicant's rights under section 14B of the Trial on Indictments Decree only begin to take effect from the date of remand by the Chief Magistrate, not from the period spent in police custody. As the applicant had not yet been on remand for a continuous period exceeding 480 days, his application for bail on this...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1994] UGHC 94
Parties
Applicant: Og. Hang Alfred; Respondent: Uganda
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Judgment Date
4 February 1994
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous Application 30 of 1993
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Lugayizi, J
Legal Topics
Bail Application, Remand Periods, Exceptional Circumstances, Defilement Offence
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Bail Application Remand Periods Exceptional Circumstances Defilement Offence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Og. Hang Alfred

Applicant

Uganda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant qualifies for bail under section 14B of the Trial on Indictments Decree due to the length of remand period.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's alleged sickness constitutes exceptional circumstances for bail under section 14A(2)(a) of the Trial on Indictments Decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's rights under section 14B of the Trial on Indictments Decree only begin to take effect from the date of remand by the Chief Magistrate, not from the period spent in police custody. As the applicant had not yet been on remand for a continuous period exceeding 480 days, his application for bail on this ground was premature. Regarding sickness, the applicant failed to provide any evidence of grave illness, and in the absence of certification by a Medical Board or sufficient evidence, the claim of exceptional circumstances could not be sustained. Therefore, the application for bail was dismissed on both grounds.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for bail is dismissed.