[2009] UGHC 28

[2009] UGHC 28

The court held that the award of special damages for fuel expenses incurred by the respondent in connection with the land dispute was proper, as these were a direct consequence of the dispute. However, the claim for motor vehicle repairs was disallowed because the circumstances of the accident were not explained,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] UGHC 28
Parties
Appellant: Okabo Quirino; Respondent: Komagum Christopher
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil. App. No.7 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal partly allowed; otherwise dismissed.
Legal Topics
Special Damages, Compensation for Improvements, Burden of Proof, Eviction, Pleadings, Remoteness of Damage
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Special Damages Compensation for Improvements Burden of Proof Eviction Pleadings Remoteness of Damage

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Okabo Quirino

Appellant

Komagum Christopher

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the trial Chief Magistrate erred in awarding special damages for subject matter not connected to the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the trial Chief Magistrate erred in not allowing compensation for the appellant's properties on the land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the award of special damages for fuel expenses incurred by the respondent in connection with the land dispute was proper, as these were a direct consequence of the dispute. However, the claim for motor vehicle repairs was disallowed because the circumstances of the accident were not explained, making the loss too remote to be recoverable as special damages. On the issue of compensation for the appellant's properties, the court found that the appellant failed to counterclaim for compensation or provide evidence of the items and their values. The burden was on the appellant to plead and prove compensation, which was not done. Therefore, the trial Chief Magistrate was...

Court Disposition

Appeal partly allowed; otherwise dismissed.

Orders

  • The sum of UGX 1,254,738 for motor vehicle repairs is disallowed as special damages.
  • The decree in the suit shall be amended accordingly.