[2009] UGHC 33
The appellate court found that the evidence on record, including testimony from both parties and independent witnesses, established that the fathers of the appellant and respondent jointly owned and used the disputed land. The trial magistrate's decision to divide the land equally was supported by overwhelming...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] UGHC 33
- Parties
- Appellant: Okello Albino Ayella; Respondent: Barnabas Oryema
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Civil Application No.23 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Land Ownership Dispute, Customary Land Rights, Division of Land, Costs Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Okello Albino Ayella
Appellant
Barnabas Oryema
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial magistrate erred in law and fact in ordering equal division of the disputed land between the parties.
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate properly evaluated the evidence before reaching his decision.
- 3 Whether the procedure at the locus in quo was proper, particularly regarding the taking of evidence.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellate court found that the evidence on record, including testimony from both parties and independent witnesses, established that the fathers of the appellant and respondent jointly owned and used the disputed land. The trial magistrate's decision to divide the land equally was supported by overwhelming evidence, including the lack of clear boundaries and shared use of features such as graves and cultivated areas. The procedure at the locus in quo was not materially flawed, as the only additional testimony was from an elder whose evidence was corroborative. The trial magistrate properly exercised discretion in ordering each party to bear its own costs, given their partial success....
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
- The disputed land shall be divided equally between the appellant and respondent as directed by the trial court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
3 paragraphs
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;} {\f12\fnil\fcharset129\fprq1{\*\panose 02030600000101010101}Batang{\*\falt Arial Unicode MS};}{\f252\fnil\fcharset129\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@Batang;}{\f253\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f254\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f256\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f257\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f258\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f259\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f260\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f261\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid3693175 footer;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid3693175 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid2044459\rsid3693175\rsid4861293\rsid8280005\rsid8537891\rsid9460806\rsid9505451\rsid10190831\rsid11028485\rsid11617763\rsid12149959\rsid13118933\rsid13249858\rsid13526273\rsid15141252 \rsid15496206\rsid15945242}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author Everlyn}{\operator jchemeri}{\creatim\yr2009\mo8\dy19\hr11}{\revtim\yr2009\mo8\dy19\hr11}{\printim\yr2009\mo3\dy5\hr10\min22}{\version2} {\edmins0}{\nofpages3}{\nofwords745}{\nofchars4248}{\nofcharsws4984}{\vern24689}}\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1 \dgvshow1\jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot15141252\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11028485 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11028485 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11028485 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid11028485 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\titlepg\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid3693175\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11028485 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs16\insrsid10190831 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid8280005 2}}}{\cs16\insrsid10190831 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0\pararsid3693175 {\insrsid10190831 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15141252 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 HOLDEN AT GULU \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 HCT \hich\f0 \endash \loch\f0 02 \hich\f0 \endash \loch\f0 CV \hich\f0 \endash \loch\f0 CA \hich\f0 \endash \loch\f0 023 \hich\f0 \endash \loch\f0 2003 \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 (Arising from CS. No. 35 \hich\f0 \endash \loch\f0 2005) \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15141252 {\b\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 OKELLO ALBINO AYELLA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>APPELLANT \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15141252 {\b\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 VERSUS \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15141252 {\b\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 BARNABAS ORYEMA \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 >>>> \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>RESPONDENT \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15141252 {\b\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 BEFORE: HON. JUSTIC\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 E REMMY K. KASULE
\par \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 JUDGMENT \par }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15141252 {\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 The appellant appealed against }{ \dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 the }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 judgment of the Magistrate Grade I}{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 ,}{\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 Gulu}{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 ,}{\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 dated 21.07.2003 passed in Chief Magistrate\hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s Court Civil Case No. 035 of 2002. \par \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 In the suit the appellant sued the respondent in respect of a piece o\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 f\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 land at Pal\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 e\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 nga Parish, Bobi Sub-county, Gulu District, complaining that on 26.03.1990 the defendant had crossed the tributary of \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 river Lamin-Ayila and trespassed on plaintiff\hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s land by constructing grass}{ \dbch\af12\insrsid13118933\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 thatched houses thereon. The defendant and his a\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 gents also proceeded to intimidate the plainti}{\dbch\af12\insrsid13118933\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 ff asserting that he was a non Acholi and therefore should not own land in that place.}{\dbch\af12\insrsid15141252\charrsid8280005
\par }{\dbch\af12\insrsid2044459\charrsid8280005 \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 The trial court held a full hearing where the plaintiff testified and called three other witnesses. The defendant, due to\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 sickness did not testify, but his son, Paul Oryema, DW1 testified and called three other witnesses. The court visited the locus in quo. \par \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 The trial court evaluated the evidence adduced before it}{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 ;}{\dbch\af12\insrsid2044459\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 and also what it observed on the actual land}{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 ,}{\dbch\af12\insrsid2044459\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 and then held\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 that both plaintiff and defendant have a stake in the land because their respective fathers stayed and utilized the disputed land together. Court then directed that the disputed land be divided equally between the plaintiff and defendant, with each part \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 y\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 having an equal portion of the wetland}{\dbch\af12\insrsid15945242\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 }{\dbch\af12\insrsid2044459\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 (swamp), }{ \dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 and further that }{\dbch\af12\insrsid2044459\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 the plaintiff\hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s portion to involve part of his current homestead. The L. C. I Committee, Hoe Chief Committee }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15945242\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 and the elders were to ensure that the division is equitably carried out and perma \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 nent boundaries along common borders established. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.}{\dbch\af12\insrsid2044459\charrsid8280005 \par }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15945242\charrsid8280005 \par }{\dbch\af12\insrsid12149959\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 There are four grounds of appeal. \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 The first one is that the trial Magistrate erred in law and fact in holding that the disputed land should be divided}{\dbch\af12\insrsid13526273\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 equally\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 between the plaintiff and the defendant.}{\dbch\af12\insrsid12149959\charrsid8280005 \par }{\dbch\af12\insrsid13526273\charrsid8280005 \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 Court has reviewed the evidence adduced before the trial court. }{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 T}{\dbch\af12\insrsid13526273\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 here is over whelming evidence on record that the fathers of appellant and respondent owned and used this land together: PW2 stated the land had be\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 en given to plaintiff\hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s father by respondent defendant \hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s grandfather PW4. L. C. I Chairman, stated respondent/defendant went to him wanting appellant/plaintiff vacate the land his i.e. respondent\hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s parents gave to the appellant/plaintiff\hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s parents. DW1 ad\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 m\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 itted that the land in dispute is also where appellant/plaintiff\hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s father was buried. He explained: \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid8537891 {\b\dbch\af12\insrsid13526273\charrsid8280005 \loch\af0\dbch\af12\hich\f0 \'93\loch\f0 \hich\f0 Your father was in good terms with my parents so they could not chase your father from the land\'94 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15141252 {\dbch\af12\insrsid13526273\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 PW2 and DW3 also testified that defendant\hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s father gave s\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 ome land to the plaintiff\hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s father to settle on.}{\dbch\af12\insrsid9460806\charrsid8280005 \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 The court on visiting the locus in quo}{\dbch\af12\insrsid9505451\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 saw features that showed that appellant/plaintiff and respondent/defendant}{ \dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 both }{\dbch\af12\insrsid9505451\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 staying on the land. These features were trees, graves and areas cultivated and the lac \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 k of boundaries, yet both appellant and respondent\hich\f0 \rquote \loch\f0 s fathers occupied and used the same land. An elder of the area Binansio, who was an independent witness also so stated to court.}{ \dbch\af12\insrsid13526273\charrsid8280005 \par }{\dbch\af12\insrsid9505451\charrsid8280005 \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 On the basis of the above evidence the decision of the trial magistrate c\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 annot be faulted. The first ground of appeal thus fails. \par \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 The second ground is that the learned trial magistrate}{\dbch\af12\insrsid4861293\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 failed to properly evaluate the evidence before him and hence he came to the wrong conclusion. This court has re-evaluated the evidence on re\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 cord, and as already held in respect of the first ground, the trial magistrate reached a correct conclusion. There is no merit in the second ground.}{\dbch\af12\insrsid9505451\charrsid8280005 \par }{\dbch\af12\insrsid4861293\charrsid8280005 \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 The third ground is that the learned trial magistrate e}{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 r}{\dbch\af12\insrsid4861293\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 red}{ \dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 when he }{\dbch\af12\insrsid4861293\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 used the wrong procedure while at the\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 locus in quo by allowing no}{ \dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 n}{\dbch\af12\insrsid4861293\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 witnesses to testify. \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 From the record of proceedings the only person who testified to court }{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 at the locus in quo }{\dbch\af12\insrsid4861293\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 was an elder, Binansio. What he stated had already been stated by other witnesses. Even if his evidence were to \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 be disregarded, there is other evidence on record for court to reach the same conclusion. The third ground of appeal also fails. \par \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 The fourth ground is that the trial magistrate erred in law when he failed to award costs of the suit to plaintiff. \par }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15496206\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 The plain\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 tiff was only partly successful in the suit. So too was the defendant. This is because cour}{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 t held that the land in dispute}{\dbch\af12\insrsid15496206\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 belonged to both in equal shares. Therefore in accordance and pursuant to section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act, the trial court e\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 xercised }{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 its discretion properly when it }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15496206\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 ordered each party to bear its own costs. The fourth ground of appeal also fails. \par \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 This appeal stands dismissed with costs to the respondent. It is ordered that the land }{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 in dispute }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15496206\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 be divided }{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 equally }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15496206\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 between the a\hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 ppellant and respondent as directed by }{\dbch\af12\insrsid10190831\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 the }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15496206\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 trial court. \par \par }{\dbch\af12\insrsid8537891\charrsid8280005 \par \par }{\dbch\af12\insrsid15496206\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 .......................... \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 Remmy K. Kasule \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 Judge \par \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 30}{\super\dbch\af12\insrsid15496206\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 th}{\dbch\af12\insrsid15496206\charrsid8280005 \hich\af0\dbch\af12\loch\f0 January, 2009. \par }}