[2011] UGSC 1

[2011] UGSC 1

The Supreme Court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of an interim order staying execution of the Constitutional Court's order nullifying the nomination of Members of Parliament. The court exercised its discretion to preserve the status quo until the substantive application...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] UGSC 1
Parties
Applicant: Hon. William Oketcho; Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: George Owor
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Constitutional Application 2 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Application / Application for Interim Stay of Execution Pending Substantive Application
Outcome
Interim order of stay of execution granted pending determination of substantive application for stay of execution.
Legal Topics
Interim Orders, Stay of Execution, Parliamentary Nominations, Constitutional Petitions
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Interim Orders Stay of Execution Parliamentary Nominations Constitutional Petitions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hon. William Oketcho

Applicant

Attorney General

Applicant

George Owor

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Application / Application for Interim Stay of Execution Pending Substantive Application

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court should grant an interim order staying execution of the Constitutional Court order nullifying the nomination of Members of Parliament pending determination of the substantive application for stay of execution.
  2. 2 Whether sufficient grounds exist to justify the exercise of the court's discretion to grant the interim stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of an interim order staying execution of the Constitutional Court's order nullifying the nomination of Members of Parliament. The court exercised its discretion to preserve the status quo until the substantive application for stay of execution could be heard and determined. The court clarified that the interim stay did not affect the constitutional obligation for Members of Parliament to vacate their seats as required by Article 83, but only stayed the order nullifying their nominations. Costs were ordered to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Court Disposition

Interim order of stay of execution granted pending determination of substantive application for stay of execution.

Orders

  • Execution of the Constitutional Court order nullifying the nomination of the applicant and other Members of Parliament in similar circumstances is stayed until the substantive application for stay of execution is disposed of.
  • Costs in these applications shall abide the outcome of the appeal.