[2017] UGHRC 27
The Tribunal found that the Complainant's right to freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment was violated by police officers acting as agents of the Respondent. The evidence from witnesses, including direct observation of the beating by uniformed police officers, was sufficient to establish the Respondent's vicarious liability. The Respondent failed to rebut the evidence or show that the acts were committed outside the scope of employment. The Complainant suffered serious physical injuries, was hospitalized, and continues to experience pain and disability. The Tribunal held that the Complainant is entitled to compensation for the violation of his...
- Citation
- [2017] UGHRC 27
- Parties
- Applicant: Omwony Gideon; Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- Uganda Human Rights Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 8 November 2017
- Case Number
- Complaint No: UHRC/MRT/046/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights Complaint / Decision
- Outcome
- complaint_allowed
- Judges
- Meddie Mulumba - Commissioner
- Legal Topics
- Freedom From Torture, Vicarious Liability, Compensation for Human Rights Violation, Police Brutality
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Omwony Gideon
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Complaint / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Complainant's right to freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment was violated.
- 2 Whether the Respondent is liable for the alleged violation.
- 3 Whether there is any remedy available to the Complainant.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Complainant's right to freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment was violated by police officers acting as agents of the Respondent. The evidence from witnesses, including direct observation of the beating by uniformed police officers, was sufficient to establish the Respondent's vicarious liability. The Respondent failed to rebut the evidence or show that the acts were committed outside the scope of employment. The Complainant suffered serious physical injuries, was hospitalized, and continues to experience pain and disability. The Tribunal held that the Complainant is entitled to compensation for the violation of his...
Court Disposition
complaint_allowed
Orders
- The complaint is allowed.
- The Respondent is ordered to pay the Complainant UGX 10,000,000 as general damages for violation of his right to freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment