[1990] ACHPR 8

[1990] ACHPR 8

The African Commission lacks jurisdiction to consider communications against States that are not parties to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. As Indonesia is not a party to the Charter, the communication is inadmissible under Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1990] ACHPR 8
Parties
Applicant: Wesley Parish; Respondent: Indonesia
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Communication 38 of 1990
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility
Outcome
communication declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Communications, Jurisdiction of Commission, State Non Party Status
Source Language
en
Public International Law Admissibility of Communications Jurisdiction of Commission State Non Party Status

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wesley Parish

Applicant

Indonesia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication / Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the African Commission has jurisdiction to consider a communication against a State that is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
  2. 2 Whether the communication meets the admissibility requirements under the Rules of Procedure.

Ratio Decidendi

The African Commission lacks jurisdiction to consider communications against States that are not parties to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. As Indonesia is not a party to the Charter, the communication is inadmissible under Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure.

Court Disposition

communication declared inadmissible

Orders

  • The communication is declared inadmissible.