[2000] UGHC 6

[2000] UGHC 6

The court found that the defendant failed to establish an agency relationship with the United States of America, as no principal was disclosed and the plaintiff dealt directly with the defendant. The facts showed the defendant independently approached the plaintiff for the hire and subsequently hired out the vehicle...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] UGHC 6
Parties
Plaintiff: Patrick Kimbareeba; Defendant: M/s Newlines Limited
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Misc. Appl. No. 178 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to Issue Third Party Notice
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Third Party Procedure, Agency Relationships, Contractual Indemnity, Motor Vehicle Hire
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Third Party Procedure Agency Relationships Contractual Indemnity Motor Vehicle Hire

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Kimbareeba

Plaintiff

M/s Newlines Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to Issue Third Party Notice

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is entitled to leave to issue a third party notice to the United States of America.
  2. 2 Whether the relationship between the defendant and the United States of America constitutes agency giving rise to indemnity.
  3. 3 Whether the subject matter and cause of action between the plaintiff and defendant, and defendant and intended third party, are the same for purposes of third party procedure.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant failed to establish an agency relationship with the United States of America, as no principal was disclosed and the plaintiff dealt directly with the defendant. The facts showed the defendant independently approached the plaintiff for the hire and subsequently hired out the vehicle to the US Embassy. The plaintiff's claim is based on breach of contract, while the defendant's claim against the intended third party is premised on agency and breach of a separate contract, the terms of which were not disclosed. The causes of action are at a tangent and cannot be reconciled for third party procedure. The right to indemnity must arise from a contract, not...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The defendant's application for leave to issue a third party notice to the United States of America is rejected.