[2004] ACHPR 58

[2004] ACHPR 58

The African Commission found that the delay of over four years in the determination of the applicant's appeal by the Appeal Court of Cotonou was unduly prolonged and constituted a violation of Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter, which guarantees the right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] ACHPR 58
Parties
Applicant: Odjouoriby Cossi Paul; Respondent: Republic of Benin
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Judgment Date
4 June 2004
Case Number
Communication 199 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Communication / Decision on Merits
Outcome
Violation of Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter found; no finding on Article 14; orders issued for expedited appeal and compensation.
Legal Topics
Denial of Justice, Right to a Fair Hearing, Reasonable Time Requirement, Exhaustion of Local Remedies
Source Language
english
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Denial of Justice Right to a Fair Hearing Reasonable Time Requirement Exhaustion of Local Remedies

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Odjouoriby Cossi Paul

Applicant

Republic of Benin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Communication / Decision on Merits

  1. 1 Whether the prolonged delay by the Appeal Court of Cotonou in determining the applicant's appeal constitutes a denial of justice under Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's right to property under Article 14 of the African Charter was violated.

Ratio Decidendi

The African Commission found that the delay of over four years in the determination of the applicant's appeal by the Appeal Court of Cotonou was unduly prolonged and constituted a violation of Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter, which guarantees the right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time. The Commission held that the State of Benin, as the guarantor of justice, failed in its obligation to ensure timely adjudication of the applicant's case. The Commission also determined that, since no definitive decision had been made by the national courts regarding the applicant's property rights, it could not find a violation of Article 14 at this stage. The Commission thus limited its...

Court Disposition

Violation of Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter found; no finding on Article 14; orders issued for expedited appeal and compensation.

Orders

  • The Republic of Benin is found in violation of Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter.
  • The Republic of Benin is requested to ensure that the applicant's appeal is determined by the Court of Appeal as quickly as possible.