[1995] UGHC 4

[1995] UGHC 4

The court found that neither the illness of counsel nor the alleged lack of preparation constituted sufficient cause for adjournment. The affidavit and medical note were deemed unconvincing and appeared to be tactics to delay the proceedings. The court emphasized that the case had already been adjourned to allow Mr....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1995] UGHC 4
Parties
Plaintiff: Ples Quality Printers Limited; Defendant: Uganda Commercial Bank
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No. 680 of 1991
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Adjournment
Outcome
application for adjournment rejected; hearing to proceed
Legal Topics
Adjournment, Court Discretion, Sufficient Cause, Advocate Conduct
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Adjournment Court Discretion Sufficient Cause Advocate Conduct

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ples Quality Printers Limited

Plaintiff

Uganda Commercial Bank

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Adjournment

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause was shown to justify the grant of an adjournment.
  2. 2 Whether the illness of counsel and lack of preparation constitute valid grounds for adjournment.
  3. 3 Whether the conduct of the advocate in threatening to walk out of court affects the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that neither the illness of counsel nor the alleged lack of preparation constituted sufficient cause for adjournment. The affidavit and medical note were deemed unconvincing and appeared to be tactics to delay the proceedings. The court emphasized that the case had already been adjourned to allow Mr. Serwanga to prepare, and he had adequate time to receive instructions and study the file. The threat by counsel to walk out if adjournment was denied was considered improper and unbecoming of an advocate. The court held that it would not perpetuate further delay in an old case and rejected the application for adjournment, ordering the hearing to proceed.

Court Disposition

application for adjournment rejected; hearing to proceed

Orders

  • The application for adjournment is rejected.
  • The hearing is ordered to proceed forthwith.