[1936] EACA 109
The conviction for rape was upheld because the complainant's evidence, though that of a child of tender years, was corroborated by the sworn testimony of a fourteen-year-old boy. The court found that such corroboration is legally sufficient to justify a conviction. The court also noted a procedural defect in the form of the statutory certificate but held that it did not affect the merits or outcome of the case.
- Citation
- [1936] EACA 109
- Parties
- Appellant: Ramazani Sajabi s/o Abdulla; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- East African Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1936
- Case Number
- Cr.A. 144/1936.
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- Dalton, C.J(Tanganyika), Hearne, J (Tanganyika), Sheridan CJ
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Corroboration, Child Witness, Evidence on Oath
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramazani Sajabi s/o Abdulla
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence of a child of tender years requires corroboration to sustain a conviction for rape.
- 2 Whether the evidence of a boy of fourteen years given on oath is sufficient corroboration.
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction for rape was upheld because the complainant's evidence, though that of a child of tender years, was corroborated by the sworn testimony of a fourteen-year-old boy. The court found that such corroboration is legally sufficient to justify a conviction. The court also noted a procedural defect in the form of the statutory certificate but held that it did not affect the merits or outcome of the case.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment