[1945] EACA 13
The Court held that the accused should have been tried for murder, as the depositions pointed clearly to murder and there was no legal provocation to reduce the charge to manslaughter. The concept of premeditation is not relevant under the applicable law for distinguishing murder from manslaughter. Despite this, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1945] EACA 13
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Bihemo s/o Bulwaye
- Court
- East African Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 1945
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Dismissal
- Outcome
- appeal_dismissed
- Judges
- Gray CJ, Manning J, Sheridan CJ
- Legal Topics
- Murder Charge, Manslaughter Plea, Acceptance of Plea, Provocation, Premeditation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Bihemo s/o Bulwaye
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the acceptance of a plea of guilty to manslaughter was appropriate when depositions pointed clearly to murder.
- 2 Whether the absence of legal provocation prior to the killing affected the classification of the offence.
- 3 Whether premeditation is a necessary ingredient in determining murder under the Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the accused should have been tried for murder, as the depositions pointed clearly to murder and there was no legal provocation to reduce the charge to manslaughter. The concept of premeditation is not relevant under the applicable law for distinguishing murder from manslaughter. Despite this, the trial judge accepted a plea of guilty to manslaughter, and the Crown agreed to this on the advice of the Court. The appeal was dismissed, but the Court expressed difficulty in understanding the rationale for accepting the lesser plea given the evidence.
Court Disposition
appeal_dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
12 paragraphs
## COURT OF APPEAL FOR EASTERN AFRICA
Before SIR JOSEPH SHERIDAN, C. J. (Kenya), SIR JOHN GRAY, C. J. (Zanzibar) and MANNING. J. (Uganda)
REX, Respondent (Original Prosecutor)
BIHEMO s/o BULWAYE, Appellant (Original Accused) Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 1945
(Appeal from decision of H. M. High Court of Tanganyika) Criminal Law—Charge of Murder—Plea—Conviction for manslaughter.
Observations on the acceptance of a plea of manslaughter in a charge of murder when the depositions point clearly to a murder having been committed.
Appellant absent, unrepresented.
Dreschfield, Crown Counsel (Uganda), for the Crown.
JUDGMENT (delivered by SIR JOSEPH SHERIDAN, C. J.).-In this case the learned trial Judge accepted a plea of guilty to manslaughter. The record contains the following: "Information for murder, section 186 Penal Code, is read over, interpreted and explained to accused, who is required to plead thereto. He says: 'I killed without meaning to but doing an unlawful act'.
I enter this plea as one of 'guilty' of manslaughter. As the Court would not be prepared to find premeditation in this case, Mr. Kingsley, on the advice of the Court, accepts the plea".
We will say at once, having read the depositions, that the accused should have been tried for murder and had he been, provided that the evidence substantially conformed with the depositions, a finding of murder would in all probability have resulted.
The depositions of the Crown witnesses are unanimous as to there having been no legal provocation prior to the killing. We have some difficulty in understanding why learned Crown Cousel in these circumstances accepted the advice of the Court to agree to a plea of guilty to manslaughter. The learned Judge says that he would not have been prepared to find premeditation. We are at a loss to understand what is meant by this. The term premeditation does not occur in our laws and has no significance in determining whether a killing amounts to murder or manslaughter. A reference to section 189 of the Penal Code will show what the ingredients of murder are. The question as to whether a particular killing amounting to murder has been premeditated or not is, of course, a matter which is of much importance when the prisoner's case comes up for consideration in Executive Council, but that is another and quite a different matter. The accused is indeed fortunate. The appeal is dismissed.