[1935] EACA 74

[1935] EACA 74

The court held that the appellant's intoxication was insufficient to afford a legal excuse for the act of murder. The evidence supported the conviction, and the law does not recognize mere drunkenness as a defence to a charge of murder unless it is so extreme as to negate intent. The court also noted that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1935] EACA 74
Parties
Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Midagwe bin Bulegeya
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Judgment Date
1 January 1935
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 12/1935.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Judges
Abrahamas, C.J. (Tanganyika), Gamble. Ag. J. (Kenya), Sheridan, J
Legal Topics
Murder, Intoxication Defence, Admissibility of Statements
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Murder Intoxication Defence Admissibility of Statements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Respondent

Midagwe bin Bulegeya

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether intoxication can serve as a legal excuse for murder.
  2. 2 Whether the accused's statutory statement at the preliminary inquiry should have been admitted as evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the appellant's intoxication was insufficient to afford a legal excuse for the act of murder. The evidence supported the conviction, and the law does not recognize mere drunkenness as a defence to a charge of murder unless it is so extreme as to negate intent. The court also noted that the statutory statement made by the accused before the Committing Magistrate should have been admitted, regardless of whether it was favourable or unfavourable to the accused, in accordance with established legal principles. However, this omission did not affect the outcome, as the conviction was otherwise supported by the evidence.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.