[1933] EACA 20
The Court held that parole evidence of a confession made by the accused to a Magistrate, even if not signed by the accused, is admissible provided it is shown to be voluntary and free from inducement. The absence of statutory provisions in the local law regarding the recording of confessions means that English law and procedure as of May 1930 apply, subject to the Indian Evidence Act. The trial judge properly admitted the evidence after being satisfied of its voluntariness, and even if the evidence had been improperly admitted, there was sufficient other evidence to support the conviction. The appellant's defence of intoxication was adequately addressed by the trial judge in accordance...
- Citation
- [1933] EACA 20
- Parties
- Appellant: Chuma Arap Kimenja; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- East African Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1933
- Case Number
- Cr. App. 73/1933.
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- Barth CJ, Gamble. Ag. J. (Kenya), Lucie-Smith, J. (Kenya)
- Legal Topics
- Confession Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Voluntariness of Confession
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chuma Arap Kimenja
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether parole evidence of a confession made by the accused to a Magistrate but not signed by the accused is admissible.
- 2 Whether the defence of intoxication (crime committed under the influence of tembo) was properly considered by the trial judge.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that parole evidence of a confession made by the accused to a Magistrate, even if not signed by the accused, is admissible provided it is shown to be voluntary and free from inducement. The absence of statutory provisions in the local law regarding the recording of confessions means that English law and procedure as of May 1930 apply, subject to the Indian Evidence Act. The trial judge properly admitted the evidence after being satisfied of its voluntariness, and even if the evidence had been improperly admitted, there was sufficient other evidence to support the conviction. The appellant's defence of intoxication was adequately addressed by the trial judge in accordance...
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment