[1948] EACA 72
The court held that section 209(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code cannot be invoked until the close of the evidence in support of the charge. The Magistrate's decision to allow the accused to make a statement before the prosecution had closed its case was improper, as the statutory procedure requires the court to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1948] EACA 72
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Mwangi s/o Mairongo
- Court
- East African Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 1948
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- De Lestang J, Nihill P
- Legal Topics
- Plea of Not Guilty, Unsworn Statement, Section 209 Criminal Procedure Code, Conviction Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Mwangi s/o Mairongo
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 209(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code can be invoked before the close of prosecution evidence.
- 2 Whether the Magistrate's procedure in allowing the accused to make a statement before the close of prosecution case was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that section 209(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code cannot be invoked until the close of the evidence in support of the charge. The Magistrate's decision to allow the accused to make a statement before the prosecution had closed its case was improper, as the statutory procedure requires the court to first determine whether a prima facie case has been established. In this instance, the appellant's unsworn statement amounted to an unequivocal admission of guilt, which justified conviction, but the process adopted was potentially dangerous and contrary to the proper application of the law. The appeal was dismissed as the admission of guilt was clear and the memorandum of appeal...
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
10 paragraphs
#### APPELLATE CRIMINAL
## Before SIR BARCLAY NIHILL, C. J. and DE LESTANG, J.
#### REX, Respondent (Original Prosecutor)
# MWANGI s/o MAIRONGO, Appellant (Original Accused) Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 1948
- Criminal Law—Procedure—Plea of "not guilty"—Accused requesting to make statement before case for prosecution closed—Application of section 209. Criminal Procedure Code. - Held (1-7-48).—That when an accused person pleads "not guilty" to a charge, until the close of the evidence in support thereof, section 209 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code cannot be brought into operation.
Appeal dismissed.
## Appellant absent, unrepresented. Todd, Crown Counsel, for the Crown.
JUDGMENT.—In view of the appellant's definite admission before the learned Magistrate that he had stolen the articles set out in the charge, we regard his Memorandum of Appeal as both frivolous and impudent, and were the appellant before us to-day we might well have asked him to show cause why his sentence should not be increased.
One point does arise, however, from the record before us, to which reference must be made. It appears that at the conclusion of the complainant's evidence and before any other evidence had been called the appellant intimated to the Magistrate that he wished to make a statement. The Magistrate then, according to his record, explained the provisions of section 209 to him. The appellant then made an unsworn statement which amounted to an unequivocal plea of guilty, whereupon the Magistrate convicted. We have no doubt the learned Magistrate, in adopting the course he took, wished to be fair to the appellant, but in our opinion it was a most dangerous step to take and one which did not really accord with the provisions of the section. For had the appellant, instead of admitting his guilt, protested his innocence, there would have been no evidence on the record which could have justified the conviction. Section 209 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code cannot be brought into operation until the close of the evidence in support of the charge. Then only if it appears to the Court that a case has been made out against the person accused sufficiently to require him to make a defence.
The appeal is dismissed.