[1933] EACA 24
The court held that section 28 of the Penal Code is confined to fines and does not authorize imprisonment in default of payment of compensation awarded under section 30. The appropriate remedy for non-payment of compensation is provided by section 318 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which prescribes a levy by distress and sale of the accused person's property. Accordingly, the order for two months' hard labour in default of payment of compensation was quashed, and the remainder of the sentence was confirmed.
- Citation
- [1933] EACA 24
- Parties
- Applicant: Rex; Respondent: Wandhala s/o Muholi
- Court
- East African Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1933
- Case Number
- Con. C. 548/1933.
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Confirmation / Judgment
- Outcome
- Order for imprisonment in default of compensation quashed; original sentence otherwise confirmed.
- Judges
- Barth CJ, Lane, Ag. J
- Legal Topics
- Compensation in Criminal Cases, Default of Payment, Levy by Distress, Imprisonment in Default, Penal Code Interpretation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Applicant
Wandhala s/o Muholi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Confirmation / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a court has power under section 28 of the Penal Code to order imprisonment in default of payment of compensation awarded under section 30 of the Penal Code.
- 2 What is the proper remedy for non-payment of compensation ordered under section 30 of the Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that section 28 of the Penal Code is confined to fines and does not authorize imprisonment in default of payment of compensation awarded under section 30. The appropriate remedy for non-payment of compensation is provided by section 318 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which prescribes a levy by distress and sale of the accused person's property. Accordingly, the order for two months' hard labour in default of payment of compensation was quashed, and the remainder of the sentence was confirmed.
Court Disposition
Order for imprisonment in default of compensation quashed; original sentence otherwise confirmed.
Orders
- The order for two months' hard labour in default of payment of compensation is quashed.
- The sentence of six months' imprisonment with hard labour and payment of Sh. 101 compensation is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment