[1939] EACA 75
The Court held that, as the appellant had become of unsound mind since his trial and remained so at the time set for hearing the appeal, it would be improper to proceed with the appeal. The proper course in such circumstances is to adjourn the appeal sine die, ensuring that the appellant's rights are preserved until...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1939] EACA 75
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Mutinda s/o Nzioki
- Court
- East African Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal No. 205 OF 1938
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal adjourned sine die
- Judges
- Dalton, C.J(Tanganyika), Sheridan, (C.J. Kenya), Whitley CJ
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Appeal Procedure, Mental Incapacity, Adjournment Sine Die
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Mutinda s/o Nzioki
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal can proceed when the appellant has become of unsound mind since trial.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that, as the appellant had become of unsound mind since his trial and remained so at the time set for hearing the appeal, it would be improper to proceed with the appeal. The proper course in such circumstances is to adjourn the appeal sine die, ensuring that the appellant's rights are preserved until such time as he is capable of participating in the proceedings.
Court Disposition
appeal adjourned sine die
Orders
- The appeal is adjourned sine die due to the appellant's unsoundness of mind.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
## COURT OF APPEAL FOR EASTERN AFRICA.
## BEFORE SIR JOSEPH SHERIDAN, C. J. (KENYA), WHITLEY, C. J. (UGANDA) AND SIR LLEWELYN DALTON, C. J. (TANGANYIKA)
## REX, Respondent (Original Prosecutor)
versus.
MUTINDA S/O NZIOKI, Appellant (Original Accused) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 205 OF 1938
(Appeal from conviction by H. M. Supreme Court of Kenya)
Criminal Procedure—Appeal—Appellant becoming of unsound mind— Adjournment *sine die*.
Since his trial appellant became of unsound mind and was so at the time set down for hearing the appeal.
Held (2-2-39).—That in such circumstances the appeal should be adjourned. sine die.
Appellant, absent, unrepresented.
Dennison, Crown Counsel, for the Crown.
ORDER.—In the circumstances that the appellant has, since histrial, been certified to be of unsound mind, the appeal is adjourned sine die.
$\cdot, \cdot$