[2008] UGCommC 11

[2008] UGCommC 11

The court found that the defendant defaulted on its contractual obligation to pay the plaintiff on time, and that the contract expressly provided for interest at 5% per annum on delayed payments. The plaintiff's claim for interest at 18% per annum was not supported by the contract and amounted to a claim for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] UGCommC 11
Parties
Plaintiff: Roko Construction Co. Ltd; Defendant: Attorney General
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
HCT-00-CC-CS 517 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Interest on Delayed Payments, Special and General Damages, Punitive Damages
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Breach of Contract Interest on Delayed Payments Special and General Damages Punitive Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roko Construction Co. Ltd

Plaintiff

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant defaulted on its undertaking to pay the plaintiff as per contract.
  2. 2 If so, what is the amount due to the plaintiff?
  3. 3 What reliefs, if any, are available to the plaintiff?

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant defaulted on its contractual obligation to pay the plaintiff on time, and that the contract expressly provided for interest at 5% per annum on delayed payments. The plaintiff's claim for interest at 18% per annum was not supported by the contract and amounted to a claim for interest on interest, which is not permissible. The alternative claim for US $138,894 at 5% per annum was not disputed by the defendant and was proved to the satisfaction of the court. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to general damages for breach of contract, as late payments were envisaged and provided for in the contract. Punitive damages were also awarded due to the...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • Special damages (already paid): US $143,117 (equivalent to UGX 264,766,450 at exchange rate of 1850 per dollar).
  • General damages: UGX 15,000,000.