[2002] UGHC 35

[2002] UGHC 35

The court held that both the petitioner and respondent were entitled to seek divorce on the ground of adultery alone, in line with constitutional equality provisions. Sections 5 and 6 of the Divorce Act, which created different standards for men and women, were declared void to the extent of their inconsistency with...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] UGHC 35
Parties
Applicant: Annettee Nakalema Kironde; Respondent: Apollo Kaddu Mukasa Kironde; Respondent: Moses Zizinga
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
CIVIL SUIT NO. 240 of 2000.
Procedural Posture
Civil Divorce Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Decree nisi granted dissolving the marriage; custody of children to petitioner; access to respondent; each party to bear own costs; no damages awarded.
Legal Topics
Divorce, Adultery, Custody of Children, Maintenance, Constitutional Equality, Costs in Divorce
Source Language
en
Family and Children Divorce Adultery Custody of Children Maintenance Constitutional Equality Costs in Divorce

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Annettee Nakalema Kironde

Applicant

Apollo Kaddu Mukasa Kironde

Respondent

Moses Zizinga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Divorce Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner is entitled to the reliefs sought in the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to the reliefs sought in the cross-petition.
  3. 3 Whether the Divorce Act provisions are discriminatory and inconsistent with the Constitution regarding grounds for divorce and costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that both the petitioner and respondent were entitled to seek divorce on the ground of adultery alone, in line with constitutional equality provisions. Sections 5 and 6 of the Divorce Act, which created different standards for men and women, were declared void to the extent of their inconsistency with the Constitution. Both parties admitted adultery, and there was no evidence of collusion, connivance, or condonation. The court pronounced a decree nisi dissolving the marriage. Custody of the children was granted to the petitioner, with the respondent given access and a shared responsibility for maintenance, subject to his financial means. The discriminatory provision on...

Court Disposition

Decree nisi granted dissolving the marriage; custody of children to petitioner; access to respondent; each party to bear own costs; no damages awarded.

Orders

  • A decree nisi is pronounced dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent.
  • Custody of the children of the marriage is granted to the petitioner, their mother.